MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1194425494 · doi:10.9776/13370

Using digital book metrics for navigation and browsing

2013· article· en· W1194425494 on OpenAlex
Michael Huggett, Edie Rasmussen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocabularyComputer scienceIndex (typography)Variety (cybernetics)Domain (mathematical analysis)Subject (documents)RealmInformation retrievalWorld Wide WebDigital libraryData scienceMultimediaArtificial intelligenceLinguisticsGeographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the scholar’s work migrates from print to the digital realm, new ways of browsing, navigating and searching collections of digital books are needed. The Back-of Book Index is a carefully crafted source of information on a book’s vocabulary and concepts, and if aggregated across multiple books, for a subject domain as a whole. Using a test collection of digital books in a variety of domains, we explore the use of index vocabulary to derive a series of metrics to indicate the relationships between index vocabulary and the digital collection, and the relationships between the books within a digital domain. We are investigating ways in which these metrics can be used to facilitate navigation and browsing at the domain level, to identify the most appropriate works within a digital collection for a particular subject or topic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it