Historiografía e invención: Wamba en el "Libro de las Generaciones"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEn este trabajo se estudia la tradicion y creacion de un relato sin apenas trasfondo historico sobre el rey visigodo Wamba, en el que se le presenta como labrador y que situa su eleccion como el producto de un designio divino. La obra en la que figura por vez primera esta narracion es el Libro de las generaciones, redactada en Navarra hacia los anos 1256-1270, que ofrece tambien, entre otras caracteristicas, un relato bastante singular sobre la historia visigoda. Se intenta mostrar aqui como el relato sobre Wamba resulta indesligable de las modificaciones que presenta el propio Libro de las generaciones, por lo que debe entenderse como una creacion propia de esta obra, con un importante alcance politico e institucional. En efecto, tal relato se enfrenta a otras narraciones politicas en Navarra, como la que abre el Fuero antiguo, adquiriendo de ese modo una profunda significacion en su contexto. EnglishIn this paper, I examine the tradition underpinning the shaping of a narrative on the Visigothic King Wamba, a narrative with hardly any historical support in which he is presented as a ploughman king and his election is seen as the product of a divine design. The work in which this narrative is found for the first time is the Libro de las generaciones, written in the Kingdom of Navarre in the years 1256-1270. This study intends to show that this section cannot be separated from the rest of the work and that it must be regarded as a creation by the author of the Libro that has far-reaching political and institutional consequences as a foundational stol)'. At the same time, the study tries to show the way in which this story stands in opposition to other political narratives in Navarre, as that at the beginning of the Fuero antiguo, therefore carrying a wider meaning in its context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".