MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1200463022

Amorcage cognitif pour amelioration de l'acquisition de la connaissance dans un systeme tutoriel intelligent

2012· dissertation· fr· W1200463022 on OpenAlexaff
Claude Frasson, Pierre Chalfoun

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnconscious mindCognitionPerceptionCognitive scienceKnowledge acquisitionComputer sciencePsychologyField (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceNeuroscience
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis aims at defining a new learning method to improve knowledge acquisition for intelligent tutoring systems. Learning is a complex phenomenon interlinking both emotional and cognitive mechanisms on conscious and unconscious levels. We are interested in understanding the unconscious mechanisms involved in human reasoning for knowledge acquisition. The importance of these unconscious processes is well documented in neuroscience, but remains largely unexplored in our research field. In this thesis, we put forward a new pedagogical approach in the field of education based on a taxonomy of human perception in neuroscience. We show that this method improves on reasoning which in turn enhances overall learning and inductive capabilities for knowledge acquisition in a problem solving environment. In a first part, we present the implementation of our new method in a tutorial system to improve reasoning hence leading to better learning. Furthermore, acknowledging the importance of emotional mechanisms in learning, we therefore recorded, in this first part, the emotional reactions of users using physiological sensors. The effectiveness of our method for learning and its positive impact on emotions has been validated on 31 participants. In a second part, we go further in our research and enhance our approach in order to improve reasoning for a better induction of knowledge. Induction in a bottom-up logical reasoning approach where one constructs general rules from observed examples. To better understand the impact of our method on the cognitive processes involved in this type of reasoning, we used sensors to record the users’ brain electrical activity. The validation of our approach was carried out on a cohort of 43 volunteers. We showed the effectiveness of our method on the induction of knowledge and sustainability of measuring user’s reasoning by brain recordings after applying proper signal processing algorithms to the data. Following the two parts, we finish the thesis by presenting the implementation of a new intelligent tutoring system incorporating the results found throughout this work. Keywords : cognitive priming, unconscious cognition, intelligent tutoring systems, subliminal agent, emotion, brain, biometric

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningFrench-language works237,207