MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W120233224 · doi:10.1177/159101991301900420

«Interventional Neuroradiology: A Neuroscience Sub-Specialty?»

2013· editorial· en· W120233224 on OpenAlexaff
Georges Rodesch, L Picard, Alex Berenstein, Alessandra Biondi, Serge Bracard, In Sup Choi, Feng Ling, Toshio Hyogo, David Lefeuvre, Marco Leonardi, Thomas E. Mayer, Shigeru Miyashi, Mario Muto, Ronie Leo Piske, Sirintara Pongpech, J. Reul, Michael Söderman, Dae Chul Suh, Donatella Tampieri, Allan Taylor, Karel G. terBrugge, Anton Valavanis, René van den Berg

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventional Neuroradiology · 2013
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroradiologyInterventional neuroradiologyMedicineMedical physicsSpecialtyNeuroscienceEngineering ethicsNeurologyRadiologyPathologyPsychiatryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is not bound by the classical limits of a speciality, and is not restricted by standard formats of teaching and education. Open and naturally linked towards neurosciences, INR has become a unique source of novel ideas for research, development and progress allowing new and improved approaches to challenging pathologies resulting in better anatomo-clinical results. Opening INR to Neurosciences is the best way to keep it alive and growing. Anchored in Neuroradiology, at the crossroad of neurosciences, INR will further participate to progress and innovation as it has often been in the past.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0160.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventional NeuroradiologySame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207