Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY: The pathogenesis of intracranial arterial aneurysms (AA) has been debated for many years and still remains unclear, although these entities might pose life-threatening risks to the patient and understanding the disease is of utmost importance for choosing treatment concepts. Apart from the "classical" berry-type aneurysm, there are different other types of intracranial AA such as infectious, dissecting or giant, partially thrombosed aneurysms. From the clinician's perspective, the hypothesis that some of these intracranial aneurysms might be due to abluminal factors has been put forward for many years. Alterations of the vessel wall, either due to luminal or abluminal factors may be employed for an etiological classification of aneurysmal vasculopathies as will be discussed in this article. Moreover, regarding certain aneurysmal vasculopathies as an abluminal disease might alter current therapeutic strategies since therapy should not only aim at the intraluminal repair of the artery but may also target the vessel wall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it