MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1204484292 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107337688.002

Food Sharing and the Primate Origins of Feasting

2014· book-chapter· en· W1204484292 on OpenAlexaff
Suzanne Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocialityPrimateEnvironmental ethicsBiologyEcologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Food sharing is arguably the foundation from which feasting emerged, and it should be considered as one form of food sharing behavior. Food sharing among nonkin is viewed as one of the hallmarks of human evolution and a core feature of human societies (Gurven 2004; Stevens and Gilby 2004; Bullinger et al. 2013:51). It is considered by some to be the prime mover in social evolution from proto-hominids to modern humans in terms of its possible role in developing cooperation, sociality, sexual division of labor, morality, altruism, and perhaps human economic systems (Isaac 1978; Kurland and Beckerman 1985; Gurven et al. 2000a,b; Dubuc et al. 2012:73). Yet the roots of food sharing appear to go deeper and to have emerged among our nonhuman primate ancestors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicCulinary Culture and TourismFrench-language works237,207