MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W121017840 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-185-6_2

The Contemporary Image of Thought

2013· book-chapter· en· W121017840 on OpenAlexaff
jan jagodzinski, Jason Wallin

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurprisePopularityObjectivity (philosophy)The ImaginaryThe artsAestheticsFace (sociological concept)TimelineArt historySociologyArtMedia studiesEpistemologyVisual artsPsychoanalysisPsychologyHistorySocial sciencePhilosophySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It should be no surprise why arts-based research has grown in stature and popularity over the last decade or so. Look around. We live in a culture of the image where even the edifice of ‘science,’ that bastion of objectivity, has had to face its own ‘image’ crisis. The ‘visualization’ of science has become an important area of study as the dovetailing between cognition and the imaginary is well on its way. The American entrepreneur and president of the Edge Foundation, John Brockman (1995, 2006) has called this merger a ‘third culture.’

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207