La transformation de Bourges, Colmar et Laval entre 1789 et 1848 : chronique d'un urbanisme ordinaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The general theme of this dissertation is the history of urban forms between 1789 and 1848. It reveals the importance of this under-explored period in the history of French urban planning in which the framework for contemporary legislative and administrative aspects was laid down and the the principle roles of the actors of subsequent urban transformations defined. It is a period in which projects of considerable scope first emerged that would later be realized under the Second Empire or afterwards and, interestingly, in which the municipalities themselves played an important role. The study of urban transformations and the evolution of actor's roles in the three medium-sized ''préfectures'' of Bourges, Colmar and Laval are examined, essentially through a reading of archival sources. The analysis concerns the everyday role of the municipality in the transformation of those cities' landscapes and functions, its rapports to the state and to private owners in the application of procedures as well as its questions concerning the legislation and financing of urban planning operations, the doubts its actors experienced isodoing and the projects carried out.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".