Characterization of Methicillin‐Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Isolates from Patients with Persistent or Recurrent Bacteremia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, especially with persistent (PB) or recurrent bacteremia (RB). OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of PB and RB in patients with MRSA BSI, and to characterize the isolates from these patients. METHODS: Surveillance for MRSA BSI was performed for one year in 13 Canadian hospitals. PB was defined as a positive blood culture that persisted for ≥7 days; RB was defined as the recurrence of a positive blood culture ≥14 days following a negative culture. Isolates were typed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Vancomycin susceptibility was determined using Etest. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients with MRSA BSI were identified; 14 (7.7%) had PB and five (2.7%) had RB. Ten (5.5%) patients were known to have infective endocarditis, and five of these patients had PB or RB. Initial and subsequent MRSA isolates from patients with PB and RB had the same PFGE type. There were no significant differences in the distribution of PFGE types in patients with PB or RB (37% CMRSA-2/USA100; 37% CMRSA-10/USA300) compared with that in other patients (56% CMRSA-2/USA100; 32% CMRSA-10/USA300). All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, but patients with PB or RB were more likely to have initial isolates with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration = 2.0 μg/mL (26% versus 10%; P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent or recurrent MRSA bacteremia occurred in 10.4% of patients with MRSA BSIs. Initial isolates from patients with persistent or recurrent MRSA BSIs were more likely to exhibit reduced susceptibility to vancomcyin, but were not associated with any genotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".