Entre la Historia y la ficción. Algunos temas en Yo el Supremo de Augusto Roa Bastos.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: El escrito presenta un acercamiento a la novela Yo el supremo del escritor paraguayo Augusto Roa Bastos. En un primer momento se toma como punto de partida la filiación de la narrativa de Roa Bastos con el humanismo del existencialismo del siglo XX, entendiendo su labor de escritor en compromiso con el dolor humano y con su propio tiempo. A la luz de esto, en los siguientes momentos del escrito se abordan problemas tales como la obsesión con el poder absoluto y la anulación de la otredad caracterizada por un discurso en el que las distintas voces son absorbidas en el monólogo del dictador y que por ello mismo quedan deformadas. Desde dicha deformación surge sin embargo una particular relación entre la ficción y la narración histórica. Con ello se indicaría, desde el punto de vista de la novela histórica, que la Historia no está exenta de la ficción, y que sin duda ésta tiene mucho que iluminar acerca de la Historia. Abstract: The writing there presents an approximation to the novel I, the Supreme one of the Paraguayan writer Augusto Roa Bastos. At first takes as its starting point the parentage of the narrative of Roa Bastos with humanism of existentialism of the twentieth century, understanding his writing in commitment to human pain and his own time. From this, at the following times of writing problems such as obsession with absolute power and cancellation of otherness characterized by a speech in which different voices are absorbed in the monologue of the dictator are addressed and therefore thereof are deformed. From the above mentioned deformation a particular relation arises nevertheless between the fiction and the historical novel. Thereby would indicate that, from the point of view of the historical novel, the History is not exempt from the fiction, and that undoubtedly this one has great that to illuminate brings over of the History.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".