MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W121550174 · doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-333-6_1

Historical Overview: Introduction to the Dopamine Receptors

2009· book-chapter· en· W121550174 on OpenAlexaff
Philip Seeman

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDopamine receptor D2Dopamine receptor D3PhencyclidineDopamine hypothesis of schizophreniaDopamineNeuroscienceD1-like receptorDopamine receptorSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)D2-like receptorAntipsychoticReceptorPharmacologyPsychologyMedicineNMDA receptorInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A long-term search for the mechanism of action of antipsychotic drugs was motivated by a search for the cause of schizophrenia. The research between 1963 and 1975 led to the discovery of the antipsychotic receptor, now known as the dopamine D2 receptor, the target for all antipsychotic medications. There are now five known dopamine receptors, all cloned. Although no appropriate animal model or brain biomarker exists for schizophrenia, it is known that the many factors and genes associated with schizophrenia invariably elevate the high-affinity state of the D2 receptor or D2 High by 100–900% in animals, resulting in dopamine supersensitivity. These factors include brain lesions; sensitization by amphetamine, phencyclidine, cocaine, or corticosterone; birth injury; social isolation; and more than 15 gene deletions in the pathways for the neurotransmission mediated by receptors for glutamate (NMDA), dopamine, GABA, acetylcholine, and norepinephrine. The elevation of D2 High receptors may be the unifying mechanism for the various causes of schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207