MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1217178722

普通小麦HMW-GS Dx5 与 Dx2 亚基共显性标记

2014· article· zh· W1217178722 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
万洪深, 温雯, 王琴, 李 俊, 杨武云

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2014
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBerry genetics and cultivation research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

高分子量麦谷蛋白是决定小麦烘烤品质的重要蛋白组分,其中Glu-D1基因座(Locus)与小麦的烘烤品质关系最为密切,该座位的亚基类型中,Dx5亚基的面团弹性要大于Dx2亚基。本研究根据Dx5亚基和Dx2亚基DNA序列的中间重复区重复单元数目的不同,开发出用于鉴别两种不同亚基类型的共显性标记,并利用该标记对含有Dx2亚基的川麦38与具有Dx5亚基的川麦42杂交F1植株、F2群体进行PCR分析。研究结果显示电泳条带清晰,片段大小符合期望值,F2群体检测统计结果符合孟德尔定律。研究结果表明该共显性标记能够用于早期分子辅助选择育种。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicBerry genetics and cultivation researchFrench-language works237,207