Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foreword Wayne Bergmann, Executive Director, Kimberley Land Council Introduction Ciaran O'Faircheallaigh, Department of Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University, Australia 1. Corporate social responsibility and democratisation: opportunities and obstacles Katherine Trebeck, Research and Policy Executive, the Wise Group, Glasgow, UK 2. The impact of resource development on social ties: theory and methods for assessment Sharman Haley, Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, USA, and James Magdanz, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Kotzebue Alaska, USA 3. Realising solidarity: indigenous peoples and NGOs in the contested terrains of mining and corporate accountability Catherine Coumans, MiningWatch Canada 4. Understanding corporate-Aboriginal agreements on mineral development: a conceptual framework Ciaran O'Faircheallaigh, Department of Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University, Australia 5. Indigenous peoples, corporate social responsibility and the fragility of the interpersonal domain Richie Howitt, Department of Human Geography, Macquarie University, Australia, and Rebecca Lawrence, Department of Sociology, University of Stockholm, Sweden 6. Corporate engagement with indigenous women in the minerals industry: making space for theory Ginger Gibson, Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering, University of British Columbia, Canada, and Deanna Kemp, Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, University of Queensland, Australia 7. Archaeological heritage and traditional forests within the logging economy of British Columbia: an opportunity for corporate social responsibility Bill Angelbeck, Department of Anthropology, University of British Columbia, Canada 8. Indigenous employment outcomes in the Australian mining industry Tanuja Barker, Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, University of Queensland, Australia 9. The fragmentation of responsibilities in the Melanesian mining sector Colin Filer and John Burton, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, and Glenn Banks, School of People, Environment and Planning, Massey University, New Zealand 10. Shareholder activism and corporate behaviour in Ecuador: a comparative study of two oil ventures Emily McAteer, RiskMetrics Group, USA, Jamie Cerretti, Environment America, USA, and Saleem H. Ali, University of Vermont, USA 11. Environmental justice concerns with transnational mining operations: exploring the limitations of post-crisis community dialogues in Peru Isabelle Anguelovski, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA 12. Indigenous people and mineral resource extraction in Russia: the case of diamonds Susan A. Crate, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, USA, and Natalia Yakovleva, BRASS Research Centre, Cardiff University, UK 13. Conclusion Saleem H. Ali, University of Vermont, USA
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it