MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1218808099 · doi:10.5206/entrehojas.v5i1.6161

Reseña Sirenas. Seducciones y Metamorfosis.

2015· article· es· W1218808099 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueEntrehojas Revista de Estudios Hispánicos · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Mythological Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta reseña busca dar un síntesis y evaluación del libro Sirenas. Seducciones y Metamorfosis de Carlos García Gual. En su libro, el autor analiza el origen y evolución del mito de las sirenas, desde sus primeras representaciones en los textos griegos hasta sus más recientes apariciones en la literatura moderna. El autor señala las diferencias y similitudes entre sus diversas representaciones puntualmente, específicamente entre el texto homérico y los textos que le sucedieron, trazando así su metamorfosis a lo largo del tiempo, y nos propone un resumen conciso sobre la reformulación del mito. Sin embargo, el libro también carece de un análisis contundente sobre la contribución de ciertos textos en la creación y continuación del mito. En general, el libro nos ofrece una excelente síntesis de la evolución del mito de las sirenas, contribuyendo así a estudios de mitografía y a estudios literarios y comparativos sobre las sirenas en la literatura.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it