MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W121922419 · doi:10.3406/rjenv.2004.4252

Le bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement (BAPE) : participation publique et évaluation environnementale au Québec

2004· article· fr· W121922419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paule Halley, Mélissade Forte

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Juridique de l Environnement · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La procédure d'étude d'impact environnemental et d'examen public préalables à l'autorisation des activités majeures représente le premier régime caractéristique du droit de l'environnement. L'étude d'impact a fait son apparition, en 1969, dans la National Environmental PolicyAct américaine. Par la suite, ce régime fut introduit dans de nombreux pays et des institutions furent créées pour assurer l'examen public des impacts des projets. En 1978, le Québec fut la première province canadienne à se doter d'une procédure d'étude impact sur l'environnement et d'une institution indépendante, le Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement (BAPE), chargée de la procédure d'information et de participation du public. Depuis, le BAPE a développé une procédure d'information et de consultation publiques qui s'est avérée efficace et crédible. Avec le temps, le régime d'étude d'impact québécois a révélé qu'il n'était pas sans faille et sans défis à relever.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.421
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Juridique de l EnvironnementSame topicEnvironmental and Social Impact AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207