MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W121975522 · doi:10.1155/2012/142790

Recognition of Microscopic Colitis at Colonoscopy

2012· article· en· W121975522 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Marietta Iacucci, Stefan J. Urbanski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromoendoscopyMedicineColonoscopyEndoscopyGastroenterologyLymphocytic colitisMicroscopic colitisInternal medicineColorectal cancerColitisDiarrheaPathologyRadiologyInflammatory bowel diseaseCancerDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microscopic colitis is a common condition in Canada and is characterized by watery diarrhea with normal endoscopic mucosal appearance using conventional white-light endoscopy. Two types of microscopic colitis are recognized by histological appearance: lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis. Recent studies suggest that 10% to 30% of older patients who present with diarrhea and demonstrate normal mucosal appearance at endoscopy have microscopic colitis (1). Increasingly, however, with high-definition endoscopy assisted by postprocessing of images by filter techniques in combination with chromoendoscopy, subtle abnormalities of the mucosa are apparent in patients with microscopic colitis. iScan (Pentax, Japan) is a newly developed postprocessing light filter that enhances details of the mucosal surface, mucosal patterns (i-Scan p designated iScan 1) and vessel architecture (i-Scan v designated iScan 2). i-Scan is a technique designed for differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions in the colon. This new digital modality can characterize mucosal patterns of the gastrointestinal mucosa in detail. Subtle abnormalities can, therefore, be recognized as either neoplastic or inflammatory. Hoffman et al (2) have tested the efficacy of high-definition endoscopy alone in comparison with i-Scan or chromoendoscopy with methylene blue (0.1%) in screening for colorectal cancer. They demonstrated that both i-Scan and chromoendoscopy identified more lesions compared with high-definition endoscopy alone. i-Scan was also able to predict neoplasia as precisely as chromoendoscopy, with an accuracy of 89% to 97%. Case Presentation A 50-year-old woman with persistent undiagnosed chronic watery diarrhea underwent colonoscopy, with random biopsies that were negative. Another colonoscopy was performed with iScan + chromoendoscopy with 0.2% indigo carmine to enhance mucosal surfaces and patterns, and to target biopsies in the colon. iScan 1 and iScan 2 showed irregularity of the colonic mucosal pattern, although the mucosa appeared normal with white-light endoscopy. iScan + chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine characterized, in detail, the mucosal pattern as nodularmosaic with a small honeycomb pit-pattern appearance (Figure 1). Such an appearance is characteristic of microscopic colitis. Targeted

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of GastroenterologySame topicMicroscopic ColitisFrench-language works237,207