MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W122662610

The Status of Library Automation at 2000

2000· article· en· W122662610 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary Technology Reports · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLibrary Collection Development and Digital Resources
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalogingMicroformUnion catalogLibrary scienceService (business)Library catalogResource Description and AccessTurnkeyLibrary classificationWorld Wide WebComputer scienceEngineeringBusinessTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PART 1. CATALOGING SOME IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENTS SINCE 1966 1966--MARC Pilot Project begins 1967--Ohio College Library Center formed as a regional processing center for academic libraries in Ohio 1968--Library of Congress begins distribution of machine-readable cataloging records 1970--Ohio College Library Center implements offline system for catalog card production 1971--Ohio College Library Center introduces online cataloging system 1971--University of Toronto Library Automation System (UTLAS) formed to extend automation initiatives begin by library's systems department 1972--Ohio College Library Center extends cataloging service to non-academic libraries in Ohio 1972--BALLOTS system becomes operational at Stanford 1973--Ohio College Library Center expands cataloging service to libraries outside of Ohio 1973--UTLAS introduces CATSS online cataloging system 1974--RLG formed 1974--MARC Applied Research founded; introduces MARCFICHE cataloging service 1976--BALLOTS cataloging service introduced to California libraries 1977--Ohio College Library Center changes name to OCLC Incorporated 1977--Washington Library Network (WLN) initiates online cataloging service for libraries in Pacific Northwest 1977--UTLAS becomes an ancillary enterprise of University of Toronto, separate from the library 1978--RLIN cataloging service initiated by RLG as outgrowth of BALLOTS 1979--OCLC signs first participating library outside of U.S. 1980--Informatics introduces MINI MARC turnkey cataloging system 1981--OCLC Incorporated changes name to Online Computer Library Center, but retains abbreviation 1981--OCLC Europe office established 1981--Auto-Graphics Interactive Library Exchange (AGILE II) system introduced 1982--Brodart introduces Interactive Access System 1983--Library of Congress replaces printed National Union Catalog with microfiche edition 1983--UTLAS incorporated as private company owned by University of Toronto 1983--OCLC establishes Enhance program as quality control initiative for contributed cataloging 1985--The Library Corporation introduces BiblioFile, first CD-ROM cataloging product 1985--UTLAS acquired by International Thomson Organization 1985--WLN becomes Western Library Network 1985--LSSI introduces videodisk implementation of MINI MARC turnkey cataloging system 1986--OCLC Asia-Pacific Services Office formed 1987--UTLAS introduces Japan CATSS implementation 1987--WLN introduces LaserCat CD-ROM cataloging product 1987--GRC International introduces LaserQuest CD-ROM cataloging product 1987--Gaylord introduces SuperCat CD-ROM cataloging product 1988--OCLC introduces CatCD cataloging product 1989--UTLAS introduces Chinese CATSS implementation 1990--WLN becomes private, not-for-profit corporation 1992--UTLAS introduces Korean CATSS implementation 1992--UTLAS acquired by ISM Information Systems Management Corporation 1992--Open DRA Net introduced on Internet 1995--OCLC Latin American and Caribbean Office established 1997--CATSS bibliographic utility acquired by Auto-Graphics; Impact/MARCit web-based cataloging service introduced by A-G Canada 1997--The Library Corporation introduces ITS.MARC web-based cataloging service 1999--OCLC acquires WLN BACKGROUND Cataloging is a mission-critical library operation. Reference, collection development, circulation, serials control, document delivery, resource sharing, and other library activities depend on informative, reliable descriptions of books, periodicals, and other library materials. Computerization of cataloging is consequently essential for successful automation of other library operations. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it