Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic renal cyst decortication has become the standard of care for management of large symptomatic simple renal cysts. The aim of the present case report is to present such a case in an ambulatory setting. CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old woman presented with a 3 year history of a painful 9 cm x 7.3 cm right lower pole simple renal cyst. Laparoscopic renal cyst decortication was performed through three 5 mm trocars. The operating time was 145 minutes. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The wounds were infiltrated with a total of 20 cc of 0.25% Marcaine. At the end of the procedure, she also received 1.3 g of acetaminophen rectally and 30 mg of ketorolac intravenously. The patient remained in the recovery room for a total of 3 hours. She was hemodynamically stable and was able to ambulate right away. She was discharged home directly from the recovery room and remained pain free on subsequent follow ups at 3 days and 1 month. COMMENTS: The present case report is a new trend in the laparoscopic management of renal cysts whereby patients can be treated in an ambulatory setting. This would make laparoscopic management even more advantageous when compared to percutaneous drainage and sclerotherapy. In an era of increasing health care costs, performing such cases in an ambulatory setting provides cost effective management in patients who are compliant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".