MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1231187841 · doi:10.3233/jae-2008-932

Theoretical model for crack branching in magnetoelectroelastic solids

2008· article· en· W1231187841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Properties and Failure Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBranching (polymer chemistry)Materials scienceMechanicsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical model is presented to determine the fracture parameters of a finite impermeable crack with one or more branches in a magnetoelectroelastic plane subjected to the remote mechanical, electrical and magnetic loading. An integral equation approach based on the fundamental solution for a generalized dislocation is used to formulate the problem. The problem is reduced to a set of singular integral equations with the dislocation densities along the crack line as the unknown variables. The integral equation system is solved by using numerical quadrature. Selected numerical results are presented to demonstrate the dependence of crack tip field intensity factors on branch length, branch orientation, poling orientation of the medium and type of loading. Numerical results imply that a branch crack cannot propagate in a self-similar manner. Solutions for a crack with double branches show that simultaneous propagation of branches is not possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it