MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Hietaharju PGE-enriched komatiite-hosted sulfide deposit in the Archean Suomussalmi greenstone belt, eastern Finland

2015· article· en· W1231348536 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jukka Konnunaho, Eero Hanski, Boswell A. Wing, Andrey Bekker, Sari Lukkari, Tapio Halkoaho

Bibliographic record

VenueOre Geology Reviews · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOulun YliopistoMcGill University
KeywordsGeochemistryGeologyArcheanGreenstone beltPentlanditeOlivineMaficBasaltChalcopyriteVolcanogenic massive sulfide ore depositPyrrhotiteSulfideChromiteLayered intrusionPyroxeneMagmaFelsicPyriteSphaleriteChemistryVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Hietaharju Ni–Cu–PGE deposit occurs in the Archean Suomussalmi greenstone belt of eastern Finland and is associated with high-Mg basalts and low-Mg komatiitic rocks. It represents a PGE-enriched type among komatiite-related Ni–Cu deposits. The Hietaharju deposit consists of several mineralized lenses in highly altered olivine–pyroxene cumulates (i.e., talc–carbonate–chlorite rocks) and contains disseminated, massive to semi-massive and brecciated sulfides. Post-magmatic processes have not significantly changed the primary magmatic sulfide assemblage (i.e., pyrrhotite–pentlandite–chalcopyrite), but has modified sulfide textures and possibly remobilized and reconcentrated the sulfides. Though the deposit is currently subeconomic, it has high PGE contents in the sulfide fraction, averaging 5.7 ppm Pd and 2 ppm Pt (average of all ore types), being highest in disseminated sulfides. The parental magma represents an intermediate type between Al-undepleted and Al-depleted komatiites and differs from most other komatiitic rocks in the Tipasjärvi–Kuhmo–Suomussalmi greenstone belt complex, which are normally of the Al-undepleted type. The relatively fractionated nature of the komatiitic basalt parental magma of the Hietaharju deposit is consistent with the low Ni/Cu (< 4) and Ni/Co (< 18) and high Pd/Ir (< 25) ratios of the sulfide fraction, similar to the values in the Paleoproterozoic Raglan belt deposits, Canada. Use of REE for constraining crustal contamination is hampered by the highly altered nature of komatiitic rocks in the Hietaharju area. Sulfides in the country rock metasediments that host the Hietaharju Ni–Cu–PGE deposit show clear mass-independent sulfur isotope fractionation (MIF-S) consistent with their age and published S isotope data from the Suomussalmi belt. In contrast, sulfides of the Hietaharju Ni–Cu–PGE deposit only possess a small degree of MIF-S, providing limited direct evidence for the role of local metasedimentary sulfur in ore formation. Archean base metal sulfide mineralization is among the potential sources of sulfur, however, and, as shown by the epithermal Taivaljärvi Au–Ag–Zn deposit, can have mass-independent sulfur isotope fractionation that is similar in magnitude and sign to that of the Hietaharju Ni–Cu–PGE deposit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOre Geology ReviewsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207