La Promotion De L'equite En Education Sexuelle Dans Les Ecoles Secondaires De la Region d'Ottawa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine les représentations sociales de l’équité en santé sexuelle à partir de données d’entrevues auprès de 30 enseignantes et enseignants des écoles secondaires de la région d’Ottawa, incluant cinq municipalités périphériques de l’est et du centre‐est onta‐ riens. Partant d’un cadre d’interprétation féministe des principaux écueils des interventions en éducation sexuelle, notamment l’âgisme, le naturalisme, l’essentialisme, l’hétérosexisme et l’ethnocentrisme, l’analyse révèle l’omniprésence d’une conception biomédicale de la sexualité qui, nourrie par l’imaginaire du risque, parvient difficilement à rompre les résis‐ tances en matière de plaisir, d’autoérotisme et d’intégration des différences sexuelles, « ra‐ ciales » ou ethniques. Mots clés: équité, éducation, santé, droits, sexualité This article examines the social representations of sexual health equity using interview data from 30 Ontario secondary school teachers from the Ottawa region, which includes five peripheral municipalities east of the city. Based on a feminist interpretation of the main pitfalls in sexual education—ageism, naturalism, essentialism, heterosexism, and ethnocen‐ trism—our analysis confirms the omnipresence of a biomedical notion of sexuality that, driven by the perception of risk, fails to address both pleasure and auto‐eroticism as well as the integration of sexual and racial/ethnic differences. Key words: equity, education, health, rights, sexuality
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".