MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Focus on Function: Single Molecule Enzymology of the VS ribozyme

2008· article· en· W123260266 on OpenAlexaff
Nils G. Walter, Miguel J. B. Pereira, Richard A. Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRibozymeHairpin ribozymeRNAVS ribozymeCleavage (geology)BiophysicsCell biologyChemistryBiologyNucleic acid structureComputational biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non‐coding RNAs of complex structure are involved in numerous aspects of the replication and processing of genetic information. Within the mitochondria of the bread mold Neurospora, the Varkud satellite (VS) RNA replicates parasitically by cycling between DNA and multimeric RNA forms. The RNA contains the VS ribozyme whose self‐cleavage is thought to be essential for replication. Models of VS ribozyme tertiary structure predict three parallel helical stacks built from two three‐way junctions and a kissing loop interaction. Whether or not such complex RNA architectures are dynamic and how catalytic activity emerges is ill‐understood. Here we exploit single molecule FRET to show that the VS ribozyme exhibits dynamic hierarchical folding. Reversible kissing loop formation involving the upstream substrate is required but only partially rate‐limiting for catalysis. Our results invoke a model whereby the VS ribozyme kinetically selects the distal downstream substrate for cleavage before the proximal upstream substrate, thus facilitating processing of the multimeric RNA replication intermediate. We are currently further testing this model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms→French-language works237,207→