MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1234022438

International police operations against online child pornography

2005· article· en· W1234022438 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tony Krone

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends and issues in crime and criminal justice · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChild pornographyPornographyLaw enforcementUnintended consequencesEnforcementPossession (linguistics)The InternetOvertimePolitical scienceAdvertisingCriminologyLawInternet privacyPublic relationsPsychologyBusinessComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Online child pornography is an unintended aspect of the widespread adoption of information and communications technologies. Child pornography involves the sexual abuse of children on a global basis. It appears that a once limited trade has seen remarkable growth, with the potential to intrude into the homes and workplaces of all those connected to the internet. Occasionally, exposure to this form of pornography may be unintended, but in most cases it is deliberately sought out, retained and traded worldwide. There have been many instances of law enforcement action, both locally and internationally, targeting those involved in the possession or distribution of online child pornography, some of which have involved thousands of suspects. This paper looks at 31 well-publicised operations and considers the law enforcement implications of these for future operations. It starts to fill a significant gap in our understanding of online child pornography. Toni Makkai Director The amount of media attention given to the issue of child pornography has risen dramatically. A search of a global English-language newspaper archive showed that between 1976 and 1989 there were 2,095 articles that referred to child pornography, between 1990 and 1994 there were 4,573 articles, between 1995 and 1999 there were 21,507 articles and between 2000 and September 2004 there were 51 ,270 articles (Factiva 2004). To some extent, the results of the search are affected by changes to database recording practices overtime. The dramatic increase in media coverage also reflects a number of other developments: the proliferation of material through the use of digital information and communications technologies; the introduction in many countries of specific offences of possessing child pornography; increased police activity in response to new laws; and a fascination with the aspects of international networking and the numbers of persons involved. There has been a steady stream of reports of various police operations that have led to the identification of tens, hundreds and even hundreds of thousands of possible suspects, involving a confusing array of individuals, networks and police operation code-names. This paper analyses major operations that have been reported since the early 1990s following the advent of the internet and the widespread enactment of child pornography possession offences. Methodology The following English-language sources were searched for reports of police operations against online child pornography: * the Factiva database of English-language newspapers from 1976 to 2004; * an Australian media digesting service, a Google media alert service, the Cybercrime-alerts service and the Computer Crime Research Center alert service (to collect reports in the period from August 2003 to September 2004); and * governmental and non-governmental agency reports on the policing of online child pornography. Because this research was based on English-language searches, the material derived is principally from Australian, Canadian, United States and United Kingdom sources. The research does not seek to provide a comprehensive global survey or a representative sample of police operations against online child pornography. This study provides a basis for analysis at least for those police operations that have been reported on. The reports considered are not exhaustive, Media reports must be treated with caution, as they may be incomplete or misleading. The details of the matters considered here are therefore drawn from a variety of sources wherever possible. Information, such as the number of persons involved as suspects, persons arrested and persons convicted, should be treated as indicative only. Other limitations of the material presented are: many networks are international and span differing laws against child pornography; media attention is directed to major cases; and there are too many police stings to catalogue here. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrends and issues in crime and criminal justiceSame topicSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207