Eloi Planes, presidente del comité organizador del Salón Internacional de la Piscina de Barcelona: "El salón Internacional de la Piscina de Barcelona no es sólo una exposición comercial, sino un foro de debate sectorial"
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Two methods of analysing language mobility are presented. The first is based on the distinction between structural mobility, which produces a change in the final (or home-language) composition relative to the initial (or mother-tongue) composition, and exchange mobility, which measures the frequency of balanced transfers between each pair of languages....The second method is more conventional in that it relies on the theory of stationary Markov chains. It entails the transformation of language mobility rates into an equilibrium composition. The latter is then compared with the observed compositions. Except in very special cases, this method yields less useful results than the first one, which is better suited to the concerns underlying language mobility research." The geographic focus is on Quebec and Canada. (summary in ENG, SPA)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it