Salmonella enterica in Alberta Slaughter Hogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cecal samples were collected and cultured to determine the occurrence of Salmonella spp. in Alberta slaughter hogs. Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica was recovered from 211/602 samples yielding 282 individual isolates distributed among 37 serotypes. The 5 most common serotypes (California, lnfantis, Derby, Mbandanka and Worthington) comprised 68.4% of all isolates. Resistance to tetracycline, streptomycin, and sulfamethoxazole, were commonly identified. Resistance to 5 or more antibiotics was noted in 9.6% of all isolates, and only in serotypes Agona, California, Derby, Typhimurium var. Copenhagen DTl 04, and Worthington. This study has shown that 35% of Alberta slaughter hogs carry S. enterica subsp. enterica. Resistance by Salmonella spp. isolates to streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline, singly or in combination, was relatively frequent but multi-resistant isolates were less common.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".