How Has a Literacy Focus Changed Pedagogy across the Curriculum in Sydney Catholic Secondary Schools, 1995-2000?.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prior to about 1995, few secondary schools teachers outside the English KLA (Key Learning Areas) in Sydney's Catholic schools consciously focused on the development of literacy in their teaching approaches. By the mid-1990s however, a number of educational perspectives (e.g. genre approaches, teaching/learning cycles integrating content with literacy skills, different students' learning styles, explicit methods of teaching literacy) had converged to produce pedagogical approaches that were more concrete and more easily understood than had been the case with the Language Across the Curriculum policies of earlier decades. In particular this has involved teaching writing and reading through an understanding of text types. National Professional Development funding (1994-7) was instrumental in training a large number of school-based facilitators in pedagogical approaches utilizing a number of written text types. After this the Sydney Catholic Education Office developed a Secondary Writing Position Paper outlining the knowledge about text types already possessed by incoming Year 7 students as a result of the new English K-6 Syllabus, and explaining how secondary teachers could develop these further in their specific subjects. A Secondary Literacy Strategy for 1999-2001 was established to provide funding for school-based professional development and assistance in analyzing Year 7 ELLA (English Language and Literacy Assessment) test results and providing follow-up at cohort and individual level. The paper concludes with examples of changed pedagogy in Sydney Catholic secondary schools. (Author/RS) How Has a Literacy Focus Changed Pedagogy Across the Curriculum in Sydney Catholic Secondary Schools: 1995-2000? T. J. McMullen Sydney Catholic Education Office, NSW Paper presented at the AATE/ALEA Joint National Conference in Hobart, 12-15 July 2001 Abstract Prior to about 1995, few secondary teachers outside the English KLA in Sydney Catholic schools consciously focused on the development of literacy in their teaching approaches. By the mid '90s however, a number of educational perspectives (eg genre approaches, teaching/learning cycles integrating content with literacy skills, different students' learning styles, explicit methods of teaching literacy, etc.) had converged to produce pedagogical approaches that were more concrete and more easily understood than had been the case with the Language Across the Curriculum policies of earlier decades. In particular this has involved teaching writing and reading through an understanding of text types. National Professional Development funding (1994-7) was instrumental in training a large number of school-based facilitators in pedagogical approaches utilising a number of written text types. After this the Sydney Catholic Education Office developed a Secondary Writing Position Paper outlining the knowledge about text types already possessed by incoming Year 7 students as a result of the new English K-6 Syllabus, and explaining how secondary teachers could develop these further in their specific subjects. A Secondary Literacy Strategy for 1999-2001 was established to provide funding for school-based professional development and assistance in analysing Year 7 ELLA test results and providing follow-up at cohort and individual level.Prior to about 1995, few secondary teachers outside the English KLA in Sydney Catholic schools consciously focused on the development of literacy in their teaching approaches. By the mid '90s however, a number of educational perspectives (eg genre approaches, teaching/learning cycles integrating content with literacy skills, different students' learning styles, explicit methods of teaching literacy, etc.) had converged to produce pedagogical approaches that were more concrete and more easily understood than had been the case with the Language Across the Curriculum policies of earlier decades. In particular this has involved teaching writing and reading through an understanding of text types. National Professional Development funding (1994-7) was instrumental in training a large number of school-based facilitators in pedagogical approaches utilising a number of written text types. After this the Sydney Catholic Education Office developed a Secondary Writing Position Paper outlining the knowledge about text types already possessed by incoming Year 7 students as a result of the new English K-6 Syllabus, and explaining how secondary teachers could develop these further in their specific subjects. A Secondary Literacy Strategy for 1999-2001 was established to provide funding for school-based professional development and assistance in analysing Year 7 ELLA test results and providing follow-up at cohort and individual level. (see http://schoolsnet.syd.catholic.edu.au/Recsite/extrapages/literacy.htm.) This paper will conclude with examples of changed pedagogy in Sydney Catholic secondary schools. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) *This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. BEST COPY AVAILABLE 2 PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".