MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W123914194

Iranian People and the Origin of the Turkish-speaking Population of the North- western of Iran LE PEUPLE IRANIEN ET L'ORIGINE DE LA POPULATION TURCOPHONE AU NORD- OUEST DE L'IRAN

2012· article· fr· W123914194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAryan raceRace (biology)EthnologyTurkishPersianPopulationHumanitiesHistoryAnthropologySociologyGender studiesAncient historyDemographyArtPhilosophyTheologyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The world is a place containing various racial and lingual groups. So that as far as this issue is concerned there is no difference between developed and developing countries. Iran is not an exception, because it can be called a multi-national or multi-racial community. The name of Azarbaijan has been one of the most renowned geographical names of Iran since 2000 years ago. Azar is the same as Ashur which means fire. In Pahlavi inscriptions, Azarbaijan has been mentioned as 'Oturpatekan', while it has been mentioned Azarbayegan and Azarpadegan in Persian writings. In this paper, attempt is made to study the race and people living there from the perspective of anthropology and ethnology. In fact, it is based on this question that whether or not, the people resided in Atropatgan have an Aryan race as other Iranians? According to anthropological and ethnical criteria of people in Atropatgan, we came to this conclusion that they have the same race (i.e. Aryan) similar as other Iranians who are the reminders and grandchildren of Aryan and Parse Medes. Therefore, the opposite is completely rejected on the view of the racial characteristics and all documents accounts for their Aryan race. Key Words: Iranian people; Atropatgan; Azaris; Anthropology; Genetic origin Resume Le monde est un endroit contenant divers groupes raciaux et linguales. Alors que dans la mesure ou cette question est concerne il n'ya aucune difference entre les pays developpes et en developpement. L'Iran n'est pas une exception, car il peut etre appele une communaute multinational ou multi-raciale. Le nom de Azerbaidjan a ete l'un des plus grands noms geographiques de l'Iran depuis 2000 ans. Azar est le meme que Ashur, qui signifie feu. En Pahlavi inscriptions, Azerbaidjan a ete mentionnee comme «Oturpatekan', alors qu'il a ete mentionne Azarbayegan et Azarpadegan dans les ecrits persans. Dans cet article, la tentative est faite pour etudier la course et les gens qui y vivent dans la perspective de l'anthropologie et l'ethnologie. En fait, il est base sur cette question que si oui ou non, les gens ont reside dans Atropatgan une race aryenne comme les autres Iraniens? Selon les criteres anthropologiques et ethniques de personnes dans Atropatgan, nous sommes arrives a cette conclusion qu'ils ont la meme race (c.-a-aryenne) similaire a celle d'autres Iraniens qui sont les rappels et les petitsenfants de aryenne et Parse Medes. Par consequent, le contraire est completement rejete sur le point de vue des caracteristiques raciales et tous les comptes des documents pour leur race aryenne. Mots Cles: Peuple iranien; Atropatgan; Les Azeris; Anthropologie; Origine genetique (ProQuest: ... denotes non-USASCII text omitted.) INTRODUCTION The primitive anthropologists tried to determine the multi types of mankind's nature by classification under the title of race based on geographical areas and physical apparent characteristics like color and others. Race is applied to a group of people who have kept the common physical or biological characteristics in successive generations (Hunter, 1976, p. 198). Or a group of natural people inherited a common physical feature; they have the same race even with different languages and customs (Saidiyan, 1991, p. 231). According to this definition what makes difference between two races is physical inherent characteristics and nothing else. In 1350 B.C., scientists found the present physical differences among human populations and classified them into three groups regarding to the color: black, white and yellow. Experts of heredity and biologists do not have a common idea about the reasons of variety in races. It means that some of them know this difference resulted from heredity and others believe in environmental effects (Fakuhi, 2006, p.287). The people of different places in the world are so mixed and it seems unlikely to determine the exact racial location. But it is not out of ambiguity, because the most anthropologists and scientists believe that human has always exposed to immigration and racial integration. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it