MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1244186400 · doi:10.5942/jawwa.2015.107.0122

An Implicit Model for Water Rate Setting Within Municipal Utilities

2015· article· en· W1244186400 on OpenAlexafffund
Rrobert Enouy, Rashid Rehan, Neil Brisley, Andrè Unger

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Water Works Association · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRevenueNon-revenue waterWater utilityWater conservationWater supplyWater useService (business)Environmental economicsWater resourcesEconomicsBusinessNatural resource economicsFinanceEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringEconomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is estimated that at least $1 trillion will be required over the next 25 years to maintain the current level of water service in the United States. A pay‐as‐you‐go approach is expected to allow water utilities to pay for these expenses using water price increases. These price increases encourage water conservation, decreasing overall water demand. Financial forecasts that fail to consider this effect will therefore overstate anticipated system revenues and potentially lead to realized shortfalls. Therefore, understanding changes in water demand is crucial for accurate price forecasting. This article combines simple relationships that are relevant to water supply services to develop an implicit model of time‐dependent system revenues, water prices, and water demand. The implicit model provides a theoretical basis for water rate–setting to generate financially sustainable water utility revenues. Results suggest that a comprehensive physical infrastructure model is critical for precision and accuracy in model forecasts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Water Works AssociationSame topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207