Characteristics and dynamics of the sand dune vegetation at North Bay, Tasmania
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The vegetation of the coastal sand dunes at North Bay on the Forestier Peninsula was surveyed in 80 quadrats along seven transects. A total of six plant communities was identified; four from the back dunes and two from the fore dunes. The back dunes were dominated by Banksia marginata Cav. and the fore dunes by Spinifex sericeus R.Br. and Acacia sophorae (Labill.) R.Br. Size class analysis of age classes of the back dune vegetation indicated and eventual senescence of the dominant B. marginata and a replacement by closed canopy trees from wet euclypt forest, such as Notelaea ligustrina Vent. Two communities were found to be of high conservation significance: a S. sericeus grassland from the fore dune and a closed-forest community from the back dunes. Both communities are in a relatively undisturbed state, although the S. sericeus grassland has been invaded by exotic herbs. For these significant communities to remain intact, weeds and human activity must be controlled on the fore dunes and fire excluded from the back dunes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".