MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1247507040

Buried pipe systems with sensible and latent heat exchanges : validation of numerical simulation against analytical solution and long-term monitoring

2005· book-chapter· en· W1247507040 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pierre Hollmuller, Bernard Marie Lachal

Bibliographic record

VenueArchive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat exchangerDimensioningMechanicsTransient (computer programming)DiffusionTerm (time)Latent heatThermodynamicsEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A finite differences numerical model for buried pipe systems is presented, accounting for sensible as well as for latent heat exchanges, so as for fully three dimensional heat diffusion in soil and flexible border conditions. After description of the algorithm, extensive validation against an analytical solution as well as against several long-term monitored real scale installations will be discussed. INTRODUCTION Lacking better tools, most authors (Athienitis et al. 2000; Bansal et al. 1983; Chen et al. 1983; Elmer and Schiller 1981; Levit et al. 1989; Rodriguez et al. 1988; Santamouris and Lefas 1986; Schiller 1982; Seroa da Motta and Young 1985; Serres et al. 1997; Tiwari et al. 1993; Tzaferis et al. 1992) are dimensioning air/soil heat exchangers by way of simple static exchange models, simple to handle but for which estimation of the fundamental parameters (air/soil heat exchange coefficient and effective soil temperature) isn't evident at all, especially in transient regime. As an alternative, some analytical models explicitly treat heat diffusion in the soil. One of them (Claesson and Dunand 1983) concerns periodic heat diffusion from a cylindrical pipe embedded in a semi-infinite medium (with constant temperature at upper free surface). The induced effect on the longitudinal temperature of the airflow has been treated apart (Sawhney and Mahajan 1994), appropriate physical interpretation and operational presentation of the results unfortunately not being carried out. A similar problem includes the interference of neighboring pipes (Kabashnikov et al. 2002) but concerns deeply buried pipes, without interference of upper border conditions. As a last case, a cylindrical model (Hollmuller 2003) treats the case of a pipe subject to isothermal or adiabatic boundary condition at finite radial distance (limitation of available soil layer). Apart from yielding explicit understanding of the heat diffusion phenomenon (in terms of the natural temperature penetration depth) latter model also puts forward the theoretical possibility, under certain conditions, to completely phase-shift the periodic input while barely dampening its amplitude, a phenomenon apparently unexploited up to now. Although they might give important insight in the physical heat exchange and storage phenomenon which are at work, preceding analytical models are obviously limited to constant airflow rates and rather simple geometries and border conditions. As an alternative, several numerical simulation models based on finite differences have also contributed to characterize diffusive heat exchangers. Some of them are limited to description of one only typical pipe (Bojic et al. 1997; Huber and Remund 1996; Mihalakakou et al. 1994). Other ones allow for the description of several parallel running pipes, with or without possibility to treat more complicated cases than steady flow rate, homogenous and laterally adiabatic soils, or sole sensible heat exchange (Boulard et al. 1989; De Paepe 2002; Gauthier et al. 1997; Gygli and Fort 1994). However, when validation against monitoring is ever carried out, latter in all cases remains limited to a few hours or days and does generally not concern real scale installations, thereby not providing necessary proof of robustness one would expect. Corroboration against an analytical solution is furthermore never given, except for the last one of these models and for the trivial case of one-dimensional heat diffusion without airflow. As a response to preceding state of the art, we will present a flexible, finite differences numerical model, allowing for description of sensible as well as latent heat exchanges. After description of the algorithm, extensive validation against an analytical solution as well as against several long-term monitored real scale installations will be discussed. NUMERICAL MODEL The simulation tool developed here bases on a previously developed finite element model, which already accounted for simultaneous sensible and latent heat exchange between air and tubes, as well as fully tree dimensional heat diffusion in soil (Boulard et al. 1989). The original model has been completely revised, so as to allow for various geometries, soil properties and border conditions, as well as to include frictional losses, possible water Ninth International IBPSA Conference Montreal, Canada August 15-18, 2005

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207