Des étudiants de l’Université de Montréal expérimentent la lecture électronique avec NetLibrary
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente une expérience de lecture électronique menée par des étudiants des cycles supérieurs à l’Université de Montréal (UdeM), dans le cadre de leurs cours universitaires, avec le système de livres-Web NetLibrary, Les résultats rapportés ici sont tirés d’une étude doctorale portant sur l’utilisation de deux systèmes de lecture sur support numérique (livres électroniques) en milieu universitaire : des dispositifs nomades que sont les Tablet PC et des livres-Web provenant de NetLibrary. Ont été étudiés les stratégies de lecture utilisées, les éléments de NetLibrary qui affectent la lecture et les perceptions qu’ont les étudiants d’un système de lecture comme celui du NetLibrary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.027 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it