MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1250850888 · doi:10.4000/lengas.603

Naissance d’une critique ? La présence de l’occitan dans la presse béarnaise de la fin du XVIIIe siècle

2014· article· fr· W1250850888 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLengas · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La présence de la langue occitane dans la presse ne date pas, comme on le croit généralement, du XIXe siècle. Dès les dernières décennies du XVIIIe siècle, des expériences sont menées, notamment en Béarn. L’avocat palois Nicolas Suberbie-Cazalet (1743-1817) dirige la publication d’une Circulaire des Pyrénées dont 49 numéros paraissent en 1778-1779. L’entreprise est un échec mais quelques années plus tard, une nouvelle formule voit le jour sous la forme d’un Tableau annuel du Béarn (1784-1787). Dans chacune de ces publications, l’occitan (béarnais) est présent par le biais de poèmes, mais aussi, à l’occasion, de comptes rendus ou de jugements littéraires critiques. Cette présence de l’occitan dans la presse béarnaise témoigne d’une légitimité qui doit toutefois affronter les difficultés commerciales, liées à l’étroitesse du marché, et un dynamisme insuffisant de la production littéraire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it