MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W125130977 · doi:10.1177/070674371205700107

Waist Circumference is a Sensitive Screening Tool for Assessment of Metabolic Syndrome Risk in Children Treated with Second-Generation Antipsychotics

2012· article· en· W125130977 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Constadina Panagiotopoulos, Rebecca Ronsley, Boris Kuzeljevic, Jana Davidson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsChild and Family Research InstituteBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersLawson FoundationChild and Family Research InstituteCanadian Diabetes Association
KeywordsWaistCircumferenceMedicineMetabolic syndromeRisk assessmentPediatricsPsychiatryInternal medicineObesityComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components in second-generation antipsychotic (SGA)-treated and SGA-naive children; and to explore the utility of clinical markers, such as waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI), as screening tools for MetS. METHODS: Subjects were prospectively recruited from the Psychiatry Emergency Unit at British Columbia Children's Hospital. As part of a quality-assurance project, a metabolic monitoring protocol was implemented, including collection of anthropomorphic and laboratory data. RESULTS: From January 2008 to February 2010, there were 117 SGA-treated and 217 SGA-naive children recruited. The overall prevalence of MetS was 19.0% (16/84; median treatment duration = 14 months) in SGA-treated and 0.8% (1/127) in SGA-naive children (OR 29.7; 95% CI 3.85 to 228.40, P < 0.001), with an increased prevalence of all components except high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), respectively: elevated WC (40.7% and 10.1%; P < 0.001); hypertriglyceridemia (33.7% and 18.8%; P = 0.01); impaired fasting glucose (12.5% and 0.7%; P = 0.005); and elevated blood pressure (41.2% and 16.5%; P < 0.001). SGA treatment was the strongest predictor of MetS (OR 19.2; 95% CI 2.30 to 160.44, P = 0.006) followed by male sex (OR 5.7; 95% CI 1.08 to 30.62, P = 0.04). Presence of abdominal obesity was more sensitive (92.9%) than BMI (68.8%), while fasting glucose of 5.6 mmol/L or more and HDL-C of 1.03 mmol/L or less were most specific (94.1%) in correctly identifying MetS. CONCLUSIONS: SGA treatment confers a significantly increased risk for MetS over the long term. WC measurement is a simple and sensitive screening tool for determining MetS risk in SGA-treated children. These data highlight the dangers of SGA treatment and the importance of standardized metabolic monitoring using sex- and age-adjusted tables in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of PsychiatrySame topicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsFrench-language works237,207