Eradication of Helicobacter spp. from a rat breeding colony.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although Helicobacter spp. have been viewed as bacteria with low pathogenicity, many investigators have shown that these low-grade pathogens have the potential to become a severe threat in immunocompromised, inbred, and transgenic animals. Therefore the presence of Helicobacter spp. in experimental animals is considered to be an unacceptable variable. In this study a formulation of medicated feed was designed and tested in an attempt to eradicate Helicobacter spp. from an infected rat breeding colony. Two feeding protocols were used: 1) treating Helicobacter-infected pregnant dams to produce clean offspring and 2) treating infected adult animals long enough to eliminate the organisms. Bacterial DNA was extracted from feces and amplified using primers that recognized the Helicobacter spp.-specific region of the 16S rRNA gene. Fecal samples from the weanlings from protocol 1 tested negative for Helicobacter spp. at 1 week before and 2 and 12 weeks after weaning. Infected adult rats from protocol 2 tested negative after three cycles of 2 weeks on and 2 weeks off the medicated feed. Animals from both protocols have remained Helicobacter-free for 8 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".