MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W125468697

The Alpha-Mendeleev Magmatic Province, Arctic Ocean: A New Synthesis

2006· article· en· W125468697 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Vogt, Woo‐Sung Jung, Martin Jakobsson, Larry A. Mayer, M -C Williamson

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographyArcticGeologyGeological surveyMarine researchArchaeologyGeochemistryGeographyPaleontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the 1970s, the Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge (AMR) has generally been considered oceanic, with a thickened (ca. 35km) crustal or/and abnormally low-density mantle root, a "hotspot"-type, Cretaceous-aged aseismic ridge perhaps generated by the controversial Iceland hotspot. The high-amplitude AMR aeromagnetic anomalies (locally > 1000nT) are sublinear, largely correlated with �20mgal free-air gravity anomalies and bathymetric/basement topography. Such correlation is consistent with most magma emplaced during the long Cretaceous normal polarity interval (120-83Ma). (Present basement topography may post-date the magmatism). Based on multibeam bathymetry from the 2003 Healy expedition and published sources, we synthesize the mid-Cretaceous-age Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge (AMR) complex, a ca.300-700km X 1500km Arctic Basin rise (>700,000 km sq; mininum basement depths<1.5km and depth residuals of 2-3.5km relative to normal Cretaceous crust). Bathymetric, aerogeophysical, and terrestrial geology (Canadian Arctic Islands)suggests magmatism extended over a larger area than the AMR proper. We compare and contrast the AMR with the Pacific Shatsky and Hess rises, and the Atlantic Iceland-Faeroe Ridge. Assuming Airy compensation, we estimate > 10 million km3 excess mafic materials under the AMR, a volume exceeded only by the Ontong Java Plateau. Multibeam bathymetry collected on USCGC Healy in 2003 discovered probable volcanic seamounts in the Northwind Basin and mapped a seamount off the tip of the Chukchi Rise. We suggest these edifices, and linear aeromagnetic anomalies�suggesting major dikes crossing the continental Chukchi Rise�are part of the same extensive igneous episode that created the AMR. Other evidence for a more extensive "AMR Magmatic Province" (AMRMP) includes: 1) Basement peaks/seamounts in the Sever and Peary spurs and Nautilus and Stefansson basins, which together would bring the total AMRMP area to ca. 10 million km2; 2) Aeromagnetics, showing AMR-type magnetic and gravity anomaly patterns well beyond the AMR; and 3) Mafic rocks (125-89Ma) of the Sverdrup Basin Magmatic Province (SBMP), as shown by M-C. Williamson and her colleagues. The northeastern SBMP adjoins the polar margin, not far from the poorly dated AMR. The two final SBMP igneous episodes are coeval with AMR magmatism, and comprise ferrogabbroic sills and thin successions of ferrobasaltic lavas, a clue that high AMR magnetic anomalies may have a similar origin, as first suggested by Williamson and Van Wagoner in 1985. However, simple amplitude comparison would be incorrect�the higher geomagnetic field intensity near the poles, shallow AMR basement, high AMR basement relief, and possibly stronger middle Cretaceous dipole would all contribute to increasing anomaly amplitudes relative to typical Cenozoic oceanic crust created at lower latitudes. We hypothesize that the AMRMP constitutes a vast mass of anomalously fractionated, highly magnetized FeTi basalts and ferrograbbros. However,we cannot exclude the possibility of admixed continental crust, especially at the Siberian end of the AMR, and only deep drilling into AMR basement will provide firm answers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.018
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207