Poétique subversive et affirmation identitaire dans les littératures francophones mineures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La réflexion sur la poétique romanesque en francophonie "périphérique", dans la présente contribution, pose le problème assez subtil de l’Insécurité Linguistique (IL), mais aussi celui du renouveau esthétique et de l’affirmation culturelle dans l’imaginaire romanesque contemporain. En effet, l’analyse des discours romanesques en situation d’Insécurité Linguistique, dans une perspective fonctionnelle (stylistique et identitaire), a permis de mettre en évidence des pratiques langagières, discursives et littéraires originales chez les minorités francophones de l’Acadie (au Québec) et du Sénégal (Afrique). Sous ce rapport, l’approche comparative, mise en œuvre, s’est avérée déterminante dans l’élucidation des stratégies discursives ainsi que les marques identitaires des communautés francophonesdans les textes de l’Acadienne Antonine Maillet et du Sénégalais Cheik Aliou Ndao.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".