Therapeutic Management of Malassezia Dermatitis in a Labrador retriever Dog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A four and half year old male Labrador dog was brought to the College hospital with the history of severe itching and hairfall since 10 days. Clinical examination revealed intense pruritus, erythema, seborrhea, and alopecia. Tape impression smears revealed budding yeast cells of Malassezia spp., which were confirmed as Malassezia pachydermatis by cultural isolation. Hence the dog was diagnosed to be suffering from Malassezia dermatitis and was treated with oral Ketoconazole, shampoo of Ketoconazole and chlorhexidine, oral silymarin and oral administration of omega fatty acids. Haematology and serum biochemical results were within normal range except for eosinophilia. The cytological recovery was obtained by 14th day, however therapy was continued for 10 more days. Owner was asked to continue shampoo for bathing once in a week for at least for 3 more months. Hence it is concluded that the combination of oral Ketoconazole, shampoo of Ketoconazole and chlorhexidine, and oral silymarin can be successfully used for the therapy of Malassezia dermatitis in a dog.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".