MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tissue Engineering the Aortic Valve Spongiosa Using Matrigel‐Cell‐Scaffold‐Composites (MCSCs)

2008· article· en· W126015897 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jordan Rachel Eldred, Kem A. Rogers, Derek R. Boughner

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecorinMatrigelExtracellular matrixBiomedical engineeringChemistryMatrix (chemical analysis)GlycosaminoglycanCell biologyMaterials scienceAnatomyBiophysicsCellMedicineBiologyProteoglycanComposite materialBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The middle layer of the aortic valve, termed the spongiosa, consists mainly of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Its function is to serve as a shock absorber and resist compression forces between the two outer layers of the valve, and is therefore a necessary component of the bioengineered valve. MCSCs were created by seeding radial artery cells (RACs; 2×10 6 /ml) mixed with endothelial growth media and Matrigel onto small intestinal submucosa, and incubated at 37°C for 0, 1, 2 or 3 weeks. Composites were stained with Alcian Blue for GAGs and immunohistochemistry was used to detect the core protein decorin. Thickness of constructs and cell proliferation were quantified, and gelatin zymography was performed to test for extracellular matrix remodeling. Constructs stayed intact for a minimum of three weeks and stained positively for GAGs and decorin. As culture time increased, MCSC thickness increased. Cell density was stable across all culture times. Zymography revealed the presence of both latent and active matrix metalloproteinase 2. In summary, these composites have shown they are capable of producing GAGs, along with one of their associated core proteins, can lay down new matrix, maintain a constant rate of proliferation, and are likely to be engaging in matrix remodeling. These findings support the use of Matrigel and RACs in our bioengineering efforts. This research is funded by The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchFrench-language works237,207