St. John's wort flavonoids and their metabolites show antidepressant activity and accumulate in brain after multiple oral doses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the last few years many data have been published suggesting a participation of quercetin flavonoids in the antidepressive effect of St. John's wort (SJW) extract. To elucidate these data more deeply we performed two animal behavioural studies examining the antidepressant effects of SJW extract, rutin and, in addition, the quercetin metabolite isorhamnetin. The substances were in all cases compared to imipramine using Porsolt's forced swimming test (FST) after oral gavage of the substances over a 9 day period. All three compounds were found to be effective, with isorhamnetin exhibiting the strongest effect. In addition to this pharmacological study, we carried out two pharmacokinetic studies to examine the CNS level time-curve of the quercetin flavonoids after a single oral dose of SJW extract (1600 mg/kg) and isoquercitrin (100 mg/kg), respectively, and to observe the cumulative effects after daily repeated oral doses of SJW extract over 8 days. After a single dose the maximal CNS levels for quercetin (340 ng/g) and isorhamnetin/tamarixetin (50 ng/g) were found at 4 h. With repeated doses the maximal cumulation for quercetin (367 ng/g) occurred after 5 days whilst isorhamnetin/tamarixetin (640 ng/g) did not reach its maximal cumulation level within the 8 day test period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".