Immagini pedopornografiche, privacy del lavoratore e protezione costituzionale: il punto della Corte Suprema canadese
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il presente commento riguarda la sentenza R. v. Cole (2012 SCC 53) della Corte Suprema Canadese in tema di ragionevole aspettativa di privacy del lavoratore sulle informazioni contenute in un computer di lavoro. La questione principale risiede nella possibile illiceità di un’ispezione di un pc da parte di un agente di polizia avvenuta senza mandato e quindi contraria alla sezione 8 della Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. La Corte Suprema decreta l’irrilevanza del consenso all’ispezione fornito dal terzo-datore di lavoro, considerando l’esistenza di una seppur affievolita aspettativa di privacy del lavoratore nel computer di lavoro utilizzato anche a scopi personali. \nNella sua parte finale il commento compara lo scenario canadese in materia di privacy del lavoratore a quello statunitense, delineando analogie e differenze fra i due ordinamenti. \n \n
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.016 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".