MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W126513807

Le Mois de la Photo à Montréal, septembre 2001 : Le pouvoir de l'image = Le Mois de la Photo à Montréal, septembre 2001 : The Power of the Image

2001· book· fr· W126513807 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arthur Kroker, Marie-Josée Jean, Élène Tremblay, Alain Declercq, Andrea Szilasi, Christine Macel, Anna Carlevaris, Mona Hakim, Franck Michel, Pierre Blache, Anne-Marie Louvet, Emanuelle Léonard, Ken Lum, Cécile Bourne, Laurent Gervereau, Ignácio Ramonet, R. W. Graham, Alfredo Jaar, Maria Antonella Pelizzari, Paulette Gagnon, Olivier Asselin, Marie Perrault, Christine Desrochers, Martha Langford, Janneke Wesseling, Vincent Lavoie, Jan-Erik Lundström, Charles Esche

Bibliographic record

VenueE-Artexte (Artexte) · 2001
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlterityArtHumanitiesPower (physics)PhotographyGazeVisual artsArt historyPhilosophyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Published on the occasion of the seventh Mois de la Photo à Montréal (2001), this catalogue presents texts by 25 writers who address a wide range of issues from diverse perspectives (aesthetic, ideological, theoretical, sociological, etc.). Topics discussed include: the power of the gaze, globalization, alterity, genre and landscape. Includes a special feature on Scandinavian photography, film and video. Interviews with artists B. Kruger, A. Declercq and K. Lum. Artist’s pages by Iké Udé. Texts in French and English. Some texts in French, others in English. Onomastic index. Brief biographical notes. Thematic bibl. 3 p.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1150.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE-Artexte (Artexte)Same topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207