MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1268800793 · doi:10.5206/entrehojas.v5i1.6158

La música popular como arena de negociación en la literatura cubana posrevolucionaria

2015· article· es· W1268800793 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Telba Espinoza

Bibliographic record

VenueEntrehojas Revista de Estudios Hispánicos · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCuban History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPopular musicArtSociologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMEN Partiendo de una definición política de música popular, es decir, como una expresión cultural que no es ajena a conflictos de poder e intereses entre diversos grupos, este artículo examina la forma en la que se trata la música popular en Ella cantaba boleros de Cabrera Infante. De manera específica indaga si en este texto se muestra a la música popular como una arena en negociación constante, en donde diversos grupos sociales siempre están tratando de atribuirle su propio significado para que su particular “visión del mundo” domine sobre las demás; o si por el contrario, se asume que la música popular es un símbolo de identidad colectiva que diluye desigualdades, diferencias y que cobija a toda una colectividad bajo un mismo símbolo de identidad nacional. ABSTRACT Taking as a central point of analysis a political understanding of popular music; that is to say, as an arena of struggle among various groups, this article explores how popular music is approached in Ella cantaba boleros by Cabrera Infante. Specifically, this article explores if the text shows that popular music is an arena of constant negotiation; that is, as a cultural space that several groups use as a means to make their own views of the world appear as natural, or on the contrary, if it portrays popular music as a symbol of national identity that embraces everyone, and dissolves inequalities and differences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntrehojas Revista de Estudios HispánicosSame topicCuban History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207