Bibliographic record
Abstract
Can J Psychiatry. 2011;56(8):445-446. Resilience involves resistance to the negative effects of tragic loss, serious failure or insult, or disturbance of the available social frame. Such experiences may be brought on by loss of valued relationships, abilities or functional level, or sources of support, and is likely to be reflected in symptomatic increase in mental disorder. Thus resilience as an issue is critical at one time or another in a probable large majority of human lives; it refers to the ability to cope with life's nontrivially difficult or unpleasant tasks, situations, or experiences with attitudes and actions that minimize or overcome their negative effects. Such coping involves strategies that include reasonable evaluation of the situation, weighing alternative actions, mechanisms of self-control and confidence, obtaining interpersonal comfort and collaboration, and other help seeking. Abilities to employ such strategies vary among individuals, as does the sensitivity to different kinds of negative experiences. Although these differences are likely influenced by genetic variation, social interactions that shape their development begin in the immediate postnatal period,' when the neonate seeks comfort, warmth, and nourishment. Neonatal offspring of depressed mothers are less responsive to social stimuli2 and biological indicators of these early behaviours1 may be early signs of nonresilient patterns of processing social-behavioural options. In the pre-school period, and increasingly thereafter, children need to understand the origins of their own emotional reactions to positive and negative experiences, as well as those of their peers.4 This understanding will arise from frequent and positive interaction with parents, siblings, and (or) other caretakers, and, normatively, will develop into skills for communicating appropriately with peers. Such understanding and skills may well serve as a basis for resilience in the face of a range of problematic experiences, peers, or negative environments. The papers in this section5,6 provide evidence regarding environmental and developmental processes in later childhood that may promote such resilience. In the first paper, by Dr Jeffrey G Johnson and colleagues,5 substantial and positive parenting during the developmental years, by either or both parents in a general population sample, is shown to be related to a much lower rate not only of the DSM Axis I disorders into young adulthood but also of the personality disorders, which themselves indicate problems in likely resilience skills. The second study, by Dr Stephanie D Stepp and colleagues,6 shows that social competence among inner-city boys as they begin adolescence serves as a protection over time to ongoing exposure to the problematic behaviour and minimized academic efforts that characterize many of their peers in low-income neighbourhoods. Again, this study6 suggests the importance of early training in the understanding of the emotional reactions of peers, as well as one's own, and reinforcement of constructive responses both to peer and to adult expectations. It is likely that these relatively resilient children may also have experienced more positive parenting than those in the same study who failed to show resilient outcomes, but such data were not part of these analyses. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".