Youth Justice Challenge: Parkside High School Proposal Summary
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the past year, student members of the Parkside Against Violence committee (PAVEAT) witnessed countless acts of violence, bullying and harassment. Consequently, it became evident that Parkside High School needed practical solutions to dealing with difficult social situations. By entering the Canadian Justice Department's Youth Justice Challenge, Parkside was given the opportunity to obtain the funds necessary in order to develop these initiatives into a school-wide anti-violence program. As the first place winner of the provincial competition, a total of $9,000 will be provided for Parkside's project, distributed over the next two years. The Youth Justice Challenge plan for 2003-2005 will focus primarily on bullying prevention. It will be implemented by PAVEAT, which consists of approximately twenty students in Grades 9-12 who meet regularly to work towards the eradication of violence. The project was developed by the 2002-2003 president, Eva Treumuth, with the assistance of the then vice-president and current president, Correen Smith.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it