MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 359: Disordered Chemokine Expression in Diabetes Following Experimental Myocardial Infarction: Potential Role in Impaired Progenitor Cell Recruitment

2008· article· en· W127052403 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐François Desjardins, Kim A. Connelly, Kerri Thai, Cory A Johnson, Thomas G. Parker, Richard E. Gilbert

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusEndothelial progenitor cellInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionLigationProgenitor cellEndocrinologyBasal (medicine)CXCR4CardiologyInfarctionType 2 diabetesChemokineInflammationStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Impaired collateral vessel formation is thought to contribute to the excessive morbidity in diabetic subjects with ischaemic heart disease where following myocardial infarction (MI) patients with diabetes are twice more likely to develop heart failure than non-diabetic subjects. Since the trafficking of bone marrow derived endothelial progenitor cells is thought to contribute to new vessel formation in ischemia, we postulated that altered chemokine expression may contribute to the impaired angiogenic response in diabetes. METHODS: Six week old F344 rats were randomized to vehicle or streptozotocin (35mg/kg i.p.) in order to induce diabetes. Once diabetes was confirmed (plasma glucose >15 mM), a total of 40 animals then underwent sham procedure or LAD ligation (MI) at age 10 weeks, and sacrificed at day 0 (sham) and days 1, 2, 4 and 7 post-MI (4 per group). Infarct size was determined by echocardiography 24 hours after ligation. RT q PCR was used to assess mRNA expression levels of SDF-1 and its receptor CXCR4 at each time point, from tissue obtained from the peri-MI zone. RESULTS: There was no difference in mortality or infarct size between the groups. In control rats an increase in SDF-1 gene expression was apparent at Day 2 post-MI, persisting through Day 7 (p<0.05). In contrast, diabetic rats showed high basal expression (6-fold vs. control, p<0.01) that fell abruptly after MI and remained persistently low throughout the 7-day time course. Diabetes was also associated with increased basal gene expression of CXCR4 (2-fold vs. control, p<0.05). Post-MI, CXCR4 gene expression increased in control rats at each time point, with fold differences up to maximally 3 times at Day 2 (p<0.05 vs. Day 0). In diabetic rats, the level of expression remained high at Day 1, significantly decreased at Day 2 (3-fold vs. non-diabetic, p<0.01) and was comparable to that of non-diabetic rats at days 4 and 7. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes was associated with paradoxical alterations in gene expression of both SDF-1 and its receptor CXCR4 with high baseline expression and diminution following an ischemic insult. These findings suggest that disordered chemokine expression may reduce the diabetic heart’s ability to recruit endothelial progenitor cells to sites of ischemic injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207