MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W127113822 · doi:10.17718/tojde.36761

Asynchronous Distance Education: Teaching Using Case Based Reasoning

2003· article· en· W127113822 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Avgoustos Tsınakos

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistance educationAsynchronous communicationComputer scienceAsynchronous learningMathematics educationDomain (mathematical analysis)Individualized instructionTeaching methodSynchronous learningPsychologyTelecommunicationsCooperative learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a new approach to asynchronous distance education, namely the employment of Case Based Reasoning (CBR) as part of the teaching procedure of a domain independent educational environment called See Yourself Improve (SYIM_ver2). SYIM was initially implemented at Athabasca University – Canada’s Open University and the University of Macedonia in Greece. SYIM’s goal is to provide students personalized distance education services via asynchronous distance education sessions, a goal which has also contributed to the construction of new student models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicSemantic Web and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207