MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1277493121 · doi:10.1090/amsip/025/13

Approximation power of refinable vectors of functions

2002· book-chapter· en· W1277493121 on OpenAlexaffabout
Donggao Deng, Rong-Qing Jia, Wei Lin, Jianzhong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAMS/IP studies in advanced mathematics · 2002
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)MathematicsPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we survey recent results on approximation power of refinable vectors of functions. Let Φ = (φ1, . . . , φr) be an r × 1 vector of compactly supported functions in Lp(IR) (1 ≤ p ≤ ∞). The first part of this paper is devoted to an investigation of approximation power of S(Φ), the shift-invariant space generated from Φ. We review results on characterizations of the approximation order of S(Φ) and describe approximation schemes that achieve the optimal approximation order. We also give a self-contained treatment of various equivalent forms of the Strang-Fix conditions. We say that Φ is refinable if Φ = ∑ α∈Z s a(α)Φ(M · − α), where M is an expansive s× s integer matrix, and the refinement mask a is finitely supported. The second part of this paper is dedicated to a study of accuracy of Φ. We review results on characterizations of the accuracy of Φ in terms of the mask in both time and frequency domains. We also discuss the relationship between the accuracy of Φ and the sum rules associated with the mask. Examples are provided to illustrate the general theory. † Supported in part by NSERC Canada under Grant OGP 121336 Approximation Power of Refinable Vectors of Functions §

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAMS/IP studies in advanced mathematicsSame topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207