Bibliographic record
Abstract
Significance: A common and widely distributed plant species in Europe (Hulten 1971; Tutin et al. 1964), Erysimum hieraci ifolium has been occasionally reported from North America, with known occurrences from Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfound land, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec, and Saskatchewan in Can ada, and from Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New York, Pennsyl vania, and Wisconsin in the United States (Gleason and Cronquist 1991; Kartesz and Meacham 1999; Voss 1985). According to Ray Angelo, curator of the New England Botanical Club Herbarium (nebc), the collections reported here are the first known occur rences not only for Massachusetts, but apparently for New Eng land as well. Associated with Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers., Carex stricta Lam., C. stipata Muhl., C. cristatella Britton, Leersia vir ginica Willd., Polygonum pensylvanicum L., Alnus serrulata (Ai ton) Willd., Cornus amomum Miller, and Salix discolor Muhl, at the Prospect Avenue locality, the plants are conspicuous because of their tall stature, thus the common name Tall Wormseed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.150 | 0.070 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".