MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sistema de gestão ambiental aplicado em uma empresa multinacional: certificação ISO 14000

2009· article· en· W1288603 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marília Aparecida Coelho, André Alves Prado

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of esthetic dentistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesProductivityPolitical scienceSociologyBusinessPhilosophyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo tem como objetivo entender os aspectos motivadores aos quais influenciam as organizacoes a investirem em acoes responsaveis perante o meio ambiente e a sociedade, para tanto, foi realizada uma pesquisa, com base em levantamento bibliografico sobre o posicionamento do cliente e das empresas, apos a insercao de sistemas que auxiliam nos impactos. Para fundamentar este trabalho, foi elaborada uma entrevista aplicada em uma organizacao, de modo, a estabelecer fatos concretos e entender o cenario da conscientizacao ambiental. Concluiu-se, atraves das informacoes coletadas e discutidas, que as organizacoes estao em busca de melhorias continuas embora se faca necessario a ampliacao desta consciencia para que dissemine as demais, sobretudo, conciliando produtividade e preservacao, favorecendo melhores condicoes aos colaboradores, clientes ao meio ambiente e as geracoes seguintes. Palavras-chave Gestao ambiental; ISO 14000. Abstract This article has the objective of understanding the motivational aspects that influence organizations to invest in responsible actions towards the environment and society. For that, it has been carried out a research, based on bibliographical survey, on the positioning of the customer and the companies, after the insertion of systems that assist in the impacts. To ground this work, an interview applied in an organization was elaborated, in order to establish concrete facts and to understand the scene of the ambient awareness. Through the collected and discussed informations here, it is concluded that the organizations are in search of ongoing improvements, nevertheless it is necessary the enlargement of this awareness, so that it diffuse those ones, conciliating productivity and preservation, thus favoring better conditions for the collaborators and clients, the environment and the next generations. Keywords Management; Ambient; ISO 14000

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of esthetic dentistrySame topicBusiness and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207