MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W129922746

Validation of the CHAMP Radio Occultation Data Using CADI in the Polar Regions

2008· article· en· W129922746 on OpenAlexaff
Samaneh Sadighi, N. Jakowski, Thayyil Jayachandran, J. W. MacDougall

Bibliographic record

Venuecosp · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonosondeRadio occultationIonosphereOccultationPolarIonogramGeodesyElectron densityDepth soundingIonospheric soundingPolar capGeologyCritical frequencyAtmospheric sciencesRemote sensingPhysicsGeophysicsElectronAstrophysicsAstronomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present the results of the validation of the retrieved electron density profiles of the ionospheric radio occultation (IRO) experiment on board CHAMP, using the ground ionsonde profiles for the Polar Regions. IRO retrieved electron density profiles from CHAMP are compared with digital ionosonde measurements at two vertical sounding stations in the Polar Region, Eureka and Resolute Bay. We compared the critical frequency and the maximum height of the F layer (foF2 and hmF2 respectively). CHAMP derived foF2 agrees well with the ionosonde derived foF2 for both the stations, whereas the hmF2 agreement is not that good.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecospSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207